&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for June, 2008

Jun 27 2008

Widespread disregard of risk creates great risk

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

What we are seeing now is a disregard of the risk of commodities, in particular Oil, and Gold.

Analysts are continually upping their price evaluations ever increasing to higher and higher levels. As if there is no risk attached with that. And I’ve noticed that a lot of investment managers have also begun to increase their exposure into the these areas.

I remember 1987 when the widespread belief that equity exposure could be increased without similarly increasing risk - just like now, that you can increase your exposure to commodites without increasing risk - this led to an unjustified - an unsustainable - expansion of equity allocation (similar to commodities now). And the carefree buying this generated led to elevated stock prices (just liek now a days we get elevated oil prices) from which a retreat was increasingly likely.

When the S&P 500 fell 10% on the Wednesday-Friday elading up to Black Monday, investors had the weekend to think things over, and they realized they had taken on too much risk, and they decided to dump stocks en masse.

So the crash was brought about not by chance, but by an event that the investors themselves had casued - the unjustifiable elevated prices.

Optimistic assumptions add to risk, and eventually proven too rosy, they contribute to losses and failures.

people ask me whether things look familiar, and how this cycle comapres to others I’ve experienced. I tell them this one’s similiar in many ways, just a different story.

We’ve had collapses in the past that we’ve survived and gone on to greater strength. The earlier ones like todays were results of things going on in specific sectors or regions LBO debt in 1990, real estate in 1992-94, emerging markets in 1997-98, and tech/telecom in 2000-02. Todays is centered around financials, and thus is containable, treatable and survivable.

There is no schematic diagram for the workings of the economy and the markets, as in “if we do A, the result will be B”. The working son the economy and markets depend heavily on psychology, which can’t be treated as if it’s hard wired.

I’m no expert, but it makes sense to me that the quantum of pain on the way down has to at least approach the pleasure everyone felt during the boom. So this rise in commodities could be seeding the pain of its eventual collapse. Just liek teh increase in US real Estate seeded the pain in the eventual drop.

When will it End

When I was a kid,t here were a lot of things on TV showing men carrying sandwich boards that said. “The end of the world is at hand”. So far, though, they’ve been wrong. Likewiose people said we had approached the endo of the financial system around Black Monday in 1987, when LTCM melted down in 1998, and when Nortel collpased in 2000. But we’re still here. It seems we muddle through, despite all attempts to screw things up, it’s my guess we always will.

I know its tempting to consider apocalyptic possibilities. But, it’s not productive, so just quit it. The world is NOT going to run out of OIL, CHINA and INDIA are NOT going to rule the economic world (remember when they said the same thing about Japan in 1991). The US Financial system is NOT going to run out of money. The world is NOT coming to an end.

Advertise Here with Today.com

No responses yet

Jun 27 2008

Markets are dynamic not static

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Through frequent play, you can increase your mastery over a golf course, as you learn the consequences of each action and this which are the right ones; if you hit the ball to spot A it’ll roll towards the hole. Whereas if you hit to spot B it’ll roll towards the water. eventually mastery is possible because the golf course doesn’t change in response to your play.

But fixing on tactics through which to master a market is not possible, because the market is shaped by those who participate in it, and thus it responds and changes. No course of investment action - even if ececuted perfectly - can be right for all markets and all times.

This is why
* Value investing does not work ALL the time
* Growth investing does not work ALL the time
* International investing does not work ALL the time
* US investing does not work ALL the time
* Canadian investing does nto work ALL the time
* Real Estate does nto work ALL the time
* Strategic Portfolios do not work ALL the time
* Tactical portfolios do not work ALL the time
etc

The reality is that there is NO investment that works ALL the time. including GICs

In fact, when an approach becomes too well accepted, the widespread reliance on it becomes a source of danger.

What does work is having a discipline and sticking to it through tough times.

No responses yet

Jun 27 2008

Volatility again and again

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Election Year volatility is again here

Virtually every US election year produces its volatile moments, and we are in the midst of that scenario.

The US is perhaps the most important economy in the world, so uncertainty as to it’s future direction and economic well-being play a greater part in a US election year. And most of the concern happens to be around the mid point of the year.

Today’s story is around Oil, and the global slowdown it produces. What will the US presidential candidates do? Can they do something? Is the world in trouble.

All of this is heightened by triple-digit losses in indexes, caused by concerns around Oil prices and downgrades in financials, a disappointing earnings report from companies such as Research In Motion Ltd.

Though the indexes haven’t met the technical definition of a bear market — a 20% drop — stocks’ recent drubbing has made their recovery from mid-March to mid-April, during which the Dow rose 11%, look like a short-lived spike within a longer, deeper downturn.

All of these concerns coming together are making people think that perhaps the world has changed.

Let’s look back at some of the key drivers of these worries

Oil

The concern has been that there is not enough Oil in the world, that demand is high, primarily from Emerging economies such as China and India. From the supply side, all nations have stated at the recent meeting in Saudi Arabia, that there is enough supply to meet all needs. They in fact decided to increase their quotas. On the point of demand, subsidies to nationals of these emerging countries have been reduced, causing the price of oil to go up for the consumers, and thereby impacting demand. Remember the average wage in these nations is much lower than the developed nations as such spending on oil will hurt much more.

The real reason for the appreciation of oil can probably be laid at the foot of analysts, speculators and the geopolitical confusion around the world in Oil rich nations.

As analysts come out with ever increasing forecasts, they through the media fuel the fear and cause speculators to increase their momentum. CIBC World Markets economists predict crude will hit US $200 a barrel by 2010. This would equate to $30 increase per year, and the thinking in most people’s minds goes it would be $350 by 2015! At which point most of us would be taking the bike to work!

The main thing that would drop the price of Oil is The price of Oil. As it goes ever higher, it like any other commodity will reach a point where people will reduce their consumption. We may well be there, as sales of scooters have shot up. But like every other bubble, the end will be dramatic and surprising, and it could appreciate beyond any sanity - we may well be there already.

Should we chase this bubble as it increases further and further? Not in our rational minds. Because the other such bubbles also ended very surprisingly and shockingly - Real Estate in the US in 2006, Technology in 2000, Gold in 1994, Asian markets in 1997, Japan in 1991 etc.

Please note most analysts are not out there to provide information to the public. They are there to promote the investment vehicle their investment firm wants them to push. And the biggest clients to an investment firm are the one’s that provide the largest commissions, as such in these days it is the commodity traders and the hedge funds with all these derivatives. So to help these special clients, analysts come up with varied reasons as to why a particular security or commodity should do better or worse. Remember it was these same analysts and investment firms that helped fuel the “great” stories of Nortel to $120, when it was really worth $2, Bre-X, Enron, Loewen Group, etc.

Commodity-related companies make up 50 per cent of the S&P/TSX and by nature they’re very volatile. So, we’ll probably see more continued volatility in this area.

Poor Earnings and Financials

The recent news was around Research in Motion RIM. The stock fell over 13% in a day, even though the BlackBerry maker said revenue and earnings more than doubled in its latest quarter. What was the reason for the drop, earnings per share fell short of analyst’s expectations.

Again these Analysts are promoting the fears about a company that has shown an increase in revenue. We are not recommending the position, since its valuation is rich. But the fact that it dropped because it did not meet someone’s expectations is wrong.

The Financials are still feeling the impacts of the Credit Crisis in the US. And again the analysts have promoted the fear that more write-downs of losses need to be done. Perhaps, they will. But what we can recognize is that Financials are strong businesses in Canada. It is a closed market, there are only 6 major banks, not a 100. And they have the ability ot increase their service charges.

Those woes have cast doubt on the economy’s ability to rebound in the second half of the year, which many on Wall Street had expected as recently as a month ago. The hope was that a mix of Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts, tax rebates and a winding down of losses at financial institutions would trigger a midyear rally in the stock market.

What will it take to turn the stock market around?

Three things: lower energy prices, easing of credit conditions, and reduction in confusion around the US presidency and the US dollar.

It’s going to take some time. The US Election is in November, companies will improve their balance sheets and earnings as write-downs move further into the past. And Oil prices will go lower as the increase impacts the consumer more and more.

Every US election year has had similar volatility, and yet, by the end of the year once a clear commander-in-chief has been elected and policies established, sanity has resumed its path.

This is not like the 1970’s when we had high Oil prices and stagflation.

First, central bank policies are different this time. They plan to resist inflation. Second, in the 1970s, workers, who had appreciably stronger unions than today, were able to pass through their costs of living in the form of wage increases. That set off a wage and price spiral. This time it’s different, central banks will fight inflation and accept some stagnation. And the unions now have much less power.

Companies have been keeping stronger balance sheets since the 2000 technology crash, and are more prudent in their spending. At some point this cash will be deployed into doing mergers and acquisitions, as the stronger companies feed on the weaker ones.

What’s an investor to do?

There are six essentials when a Bear market comes along; which nobody knows when it will occur, what will cause it, how severe it will be or long it will last.

1-stay cool - don’t panic

2-call for help - talk to your advisor, they’ve been through this before

3-get some perspective - realize that this is not the only time that a bear market has happened, also that the long term stock market chart points upwards over the last 200 or so years. If it was so miserable at some point it should have gone down to zero - never has!

4-move slowly and with great care - think carefully about your decisions

5-consider actually feeding the bear - the best way to tame the bear is to feed it so that it becomes your friend

6-remember that the bear will eventually go away.

Also,

Understand their portfolios are made out of companies that have good revenue models and balance sheets. At times the valuations that some analyst determines may not meet with the analysts expectations, but they will still continue to provide revenue.

Understand that your portfolio includes Government of Canada bonds that continue to provide income and provide a level of stability.

Understand that all of your investment managers are at their desks, monitoring, analyzing and ensuring that no extra level of risks that can impact your portfolios long term objectives are being taken, positions are being bought, advantages are being taken.

The things we do today will only be realized in the future, as sanity come back.

Understand that we will remain rational in an irrational world

No responses yet

Jun 21 2008

Leverage and Risk

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

There’s been a lot of talk about the Smith Manoeuvre, and leverage and how it works in your favour. Much of the investors talking about this only show you the upside, and the interest deductibility. Without showing the downside.

Yes, leverage can work well, as long as the understanding is there, that the markets are volatile. Remember Leverage multiplies losses as well as gains.

Leverage maginfies outcomes but doesn’t necessarily add value. it will make for higher highs, and lower lows, and it might even produce an increase in the expected value. But it can’t make something a fundamentally better investment. If something is poor to invest in, it won’t become better just because it is leveraged, or uses loeverage - just ask Bear Stearns infamous hedge fund managers.

Remember every investment or portfolio entails a variety oof risks, and it’s oveerall risks is the sum of these risks. There is specific company ris, market risk, liquidity risk, legal risk, currency risk and political risk jsut to name a few

Investment safety doesn’t come from doing safe things, but from doing things safely. ASnything can be screwed upo by using so much leverage that its fluctuations can’t be survived or tolerated by the investor. Someone smart once wrote about the famous investment Nobel prizers who ran LTCM into near bankruptcy

Leverage + volatility = dynamite

Rational

No responses yet

Jun 21 2008

What do Wall Street Analysts do?

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Finance Professor J. Randall Woolridge of Penn State says that Wall Street Analysts do two things: recommend stocks to buy and forecast earnings. Previous studies suggest their stock recommendations do not perform well, and their long term earnings per share growth rates are excessive and upwardly biased.

So for your own sanity, every time you hear “Analyst expectations”, this “Analyst saud that…”

IGNORE IT - it’s useless, and just drivel.

Rational

No responses yet

Jun 20 2008

BIG BROWN and Oil

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

If ever there was a financial instrument that seemed to be taunting the markets, the crude-oil is it.

- The Alberta provincial government has estimated that its oil sands contain some 173 billion barrels of economically recoverable crude nased on 2006 prices. This is roughly equivalent to Saudia Arabia’s known reserves. This means Supply UP

- From Evergreen Capital Management, There is a pervasive belief tat oil demand has grown exponentially over the last few years. Yet in reality, it grew 1.7 percent in 2005, 0.7% in 2006, and 1.8% in 2007. Further, China’s allegedly unquenchable thirst for oil is belied by hard data that shows its usage growth declining from 900,000 barrels per day in 2004 to 300,000 per day in 2007. This means demand DOWN

Previously, I thought oil would correct hard, but it’s ascent has led me to believe that the drop could be much more severe. What goes up fast, comes down fast as well.

Last month there was a very important Senatorial testimony given by Money Manager Michael Masters on the reasons for th eincrease in oil prices. Much of the literature that followed pooh pooh’d his comments. Saying that it’s a new era… things are different now (where have I heard that before). We heard from many commodity specialists say that Michale Masters didn’t know what he was tlaking about.

One thing I noticed about th erebuttals was how they glossed over his main point about these mega institutions ETFs and index funds getting around the long-standing restrictions about how much commodity can be owned by a single institution. Just like Mortage brokers got around the rules of debt management and loaded up people with sub-primne crap - because they knew how to get around the rules.

Remember every bubble in history had a good story.

- 1989 - House prices are increasing becasue they’re not making any more land.
- 1991 - Japan, has the best management techniques
- 1997 - The Asian Tigers, can manufacture cheaper and more efficently
- 2000 - The internet and Technology is a new way to do business, like airplanes and cars

The recent markets remind me of that phenomenal athlete Big Brown. The horse that had such an illustrous track record, and was predicted to win the triple crown of horse racing the Belmont Stakes. People were betting like crazy that just because Big Brown had won so many races before, he woudl do it again. After all, he had pedigree, he had money behind him etc

Where did he end up

DEAD LAST!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2008/jun/09/horseracing1

So much for picking the Favorite. Are you doing the same. Are you chasing something because it looks great, has done well recently.

No responses yet

Jun 20 2008

Three things to think about before selling your investment

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Three things to think about before selling your investment

Dalbar in its study continues to show that investors who trade a lot under perform those investors that remain with their strategy.

What the study shows is that holding a sound intellectual portfolio does make sense. And yet, investors, I mean speculators continue to tinker their way to misery

But there has to be reasons to sell an investment So what are the “right reasons” to sell - the ones that investors can employ with confidence? Ask yourself these three questions:
Question No. 1: Am I thinking about selling this investment based on thoughtful analysis of the strategy, or just general market panic? Bad moods, unfounded fears, and “general market sentiment” shouldn’t shake you loose from a strategy that is still fundamentally the same as when the market’s mood was peachier.

Question No. 2: Do I have a plan for where the proceeds of the sale will go next? I’ve found that almost every time I have no plan to put freed-up cash to work, I’m making an imprudent choice to sell. It makes sense that you should sell only when you’ve concluded that there is somewhere else your money would be better invested, or spent. The money should move to something better.

Question No. 3: Have the original reasons or assumptions I made about the investment when I bought it changed significantly? This entails asking hard questions about the strategies fundamentals and the market or markets a strategy is involved in.

Let me end with a final note: Expect imperfection. Realistically, investors should expect good strategies to have some imperfections. There is NO perfect investment process or strategy, and a level of understanding of possible imperfections will go along way to NOT selling unwisely

No responses yet

Jun 20 2008

THINGS I’D SAY TO MY GRANDMOTHER ABOUT INVESTING

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

THINGS I’D SAY TO MY GRANDMOTHER ABOUT INVESTING

Sometimes we get caught up in trying to talk about wealth planning to the younger investors, to prepare them for their future. Well, probably of more concern is the senior investors, for whom the world has changed.

Their secure GICs are barely paying above inflation, stock markets have become too volatile, and the media puts more fright into them.

So, here’s where I decided to talk to my Grandmother about investing.

Now, imagine this conversation: “Grandma,” I began, “here is what you need to do. Take your entire portfolio of investments and put it into a simple portfolio of managed assets, they can be strategic or tactical. Make sure that all streams of income should be as tax effective as possible, so that you can maximize the government programs. Sell the shares that have poor fundamentals, or that are illiquid. Look at investment that will pay you income for the rest of your life. Make sure you have good estate planning. You’ll be better off – and we’ll be better off. What do you think?”

Her eyes would probably squint and her would head tilt as she looked at me wondering about the third head sprouting from my shoulder. “Who is this alien in front of me” she’d be thinking.

Here are some key points I’d have to realize when talking to her:

Number one, I must make sure that I am speaking in a language my grandmother understands. Number two, even worse, I need to take the time to ask her what she wanted. As a result of that, guess what she would do? Absolutely nothing!

And who suffers is not the grandmother as they live, but their children and grandchildren (me). For at the death of the senior we realize too late all the mistakes and the taxes paid that did not need to be paid.

I used to think that the CRA was the biggest villain when it comes to preserving and ultimately transferring wealth. But there is an even bigger villain than that: procrastination. Like gravity, it holds us to a course of action that is no good.
So if I could I would tell my grandmother? These five things.

First of all, I’d tell her, “Grandma, start today. Make a commitment to start today.” It is a decision. Simple, right? Simple yet very powerful. The Chinese have a proverb concerning this. Do you know when the best time to plant a tree is? Twenty years ago. The second best time is today. Today. So, I’d tell her to start today – break free, break loose. Make a commitment to start today, number one.

Number two, I’d tell her, “Hire a specialist – a wealth preservation specialist.” Going through the process of settling someone’s estate, you’ll realize the difference that a specialist can make.

Thirdly, I’ll tell her, “Write down what’s important to you.” In 1957, a study followed the Harvard graduating class for 20 years. At the end of 20 years, they found that three percent of the graduates had out-accumulated the other 97 percent combined. Do you know what the three percent had that the 97 percent didn’t? Written goals. There is power in writing down what you want.

I’d also tell her that you need someone to help you get clear about what you really want from your wealth. You know, it’s like a fish in water. They don’t really know they are in water. It’s hard to gain clarity about what you want without the aid of someone else, someone to facilitate the process for you. Someone neutral from your own emotions.

So start today; hire a specialist; write down what’s important to you.

Fourthly, I’d tell her is to get a written, integrated wealth plan. Some of the times that I would visit my grandmother, I would notice that she had a new medication. I would say, “Grandma, where did this come from?” She would reply, “Oh, a friend of mine recommended it;” or “A doctor told me to take this.”
So I would say, “Who is figuring out what happens when you take them all together?” That is how it is with most people’s wealth planning. Nobody is figuring out what happens when you look at everything together. Every planning technique, and there are a number of different techniques including doing nothing, has side effects. So you need a written integrated plan – to see the effects of your current plan on your lifestyle, your future independence, your taxes and your heirs.

I once asked a senior executive at a company if he had ever made a significant decision in business without a simulation of the impact of that technique on the future. He of course told me “No!” It’s the same thing with life, if you’ve never made a significant decision in business without a clear understanding of the future consequences, why would you make decisions about your personal wealth without the same scrutiny?

Get a written integrated plan before you make a decision.

Fifthly, I would tell her, “Just do it. Take action. Implement the recommended plan.” As good as a plan may be, if you don’t take action, nothing changes. You may know the unusual definition of insanity: doing the same thing you have always done and expecting different results.

So, I’d tell her those five things: Start today. Hire a specialist. Write down what is important to you. Get a written, integrated plan. And lastly, just do it.

Now, if you are like most people, you might be saying to yourself, “What should I do next?” Well, take my advice to my grandmother. Start today and hire a wealth preservation specialist. Hopefully, you can avoid the worst two words in our vocabulary,

“If only!”

If only I could have told my grandmother those five things; If only she would have listened.

No responses yet

Jun 09 2008

George Bernard Shaw and his tailor

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

“The only man who behaved sensibly was my tailor; he took my measurement anew every time he saw me, while all the rest went on with their old measurements and expected them to fit me.”

- George Bernard Shaw

It’s very similar with risk. A good advisor will not take one risk measurement for an investor. They’ll keep on revisiting that question. Because risk like waist line, especially mine is constantly changing.

No responses yet

Jun 09 2008

Plato’s wise words

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Excess generally causes reaction, and produces a change in the opposite direction, whether it be in the seasons, or in individuals, or in governments. -Plato

It’s amazing that a concept Plato observed 2500 years ago still holds true today not only regarding seasons, individuals, and governments but also financial markets.

Investors have a natural tendency to extrapolate past performance infinitely into the future. what has happened lately becomes excessively over-weighted in the decision-making process. Behavioral Finance academics call this the Recency Effect. It is a critical and very costly blunder that far too many investors just keep on making, much to the detriment of their financial security.

We are seeing today in the prices of commodities. These analysts are every increasing their prices, one bettering the other as to who can push it higher! ANd fund managers and others fall in to the trap of chasign these analysts. much of the blame can also go to index funds that become skewed because of these commoities appreciating. As they appreacite other index funds have to buy these commodities to keep up with the index, and that keeps the bubble forming, until we get a sudden pop, when the index has to reduce its weighting and thereby all the other index funds - can you say lemmings!

Realize that market prices are frequently nonsensical due to irrational behavior by the investing public at large.

I tend to follow an investment strategy whose road-much-less-traveled requires tremendous conviction and discipline. Successful long-term investors need to be able to tune out friends, family, Wall Street and the media, four sources which all too often conspire to undermine rational investing. This is not to say it is done intentionally (though sometimes I wonder!) but the net effect is tremendous pressure on all of us to cave into group-think. And it’s this falling for the group-think that has led to all of the past major market crashes.

I can confidently guarantee to any of you who follow similar road-much-traveled strategies that you will assuredly, periodically, and inevitably be….disappointed.

That’s right—DISAPPOINTED. Wall Street marketing 101 dictates you never tell investors that they should expect to be DISAPPOINTED but that’s exactly what we are doing.

Am I nuts? Some folks would undoubtedly agree with that diagnosis but I think it is the other way around. I believe it is foolhardy and downright wrong to give investors the impression that whatever investment methodology is employed is going to lead them into the financial promised land of perpetually satisfying performance. It just isn’t that easy as Buffett rightly points out when he states that “investing is simple but not easy”.

Even the Oracle himself has suffered through some episodes where he freely admitted that his performance was sub-par. Of course, with his track record and marvelous communication skills he was able to keep most of his investors on board through trying times. I can recall numerous conversations with investment advisors who had felt he was too old and too stubborn in the late 1990s to realize we were in a glorious New Era where bubbles endlessly inflated. Of course, his wisdom and discipline were vindicated.

Any against-the-grain type of investing strategy will tend to lag at times, especially late in an up-trend for a particular investment fad.

In order to minimize the downsides, we utilize a style neutral approach, multi-managed, gradual re-weighting process, recognizing how prevalent it is for styles, sectors, asset classes—and the market itself—to over-shoot on the upside as well as on the downside. In addition to systematic re-balancing, we incorporate risk controls per cap and style categories to control the benchmark risk. Nevertheless, despite our best efforts to deal with this reality, we strongly advise you to be fully prepared for periods of under-performance.

However, don’t mistake this pragmatic acknowledgement of the vagaries of market movements to imply we lack long term confidence. We are thoroughly convinced we will succeed in the investment marathon by sticking to our strategy unless either reversion to the mean or human behavior change in a material way (The compliance guys cringe at anything intimating that we know what we are doing so we will also hastily add we can be wrong , we can lapse into dementia, we may have a mid-life crisis, or we may misread our information due to a sudden on-set of dyslexia and host of other real and imagined misfortunes that may befall us in the future. Whew!!!)

All in all to say, that occasionally, rationality and common sense leaves the investment platform. And I think we are in one of those times.

So, am I pleased not to be at the front of the crowd - Well yes, especially if there’s a high likelihood of a cliff coming up.

Remain rational.

No responses yet

Next »

Advertise Here