&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Archive for July, 2008

Jul 27 2008

Why Buffett Is Buying

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

A great article from Bloomberg - link below

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/marketsmag/mm_0808_story1.html

Key points

The Omaha investor is taking advantage of the market turmoil to fire up Berkshire Hathaway’s acquisition machine.

In April, he agreed to pay $2.1 billion for an undisclosed stake in Chicago’s Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. as part of McLean, Virginia-based Mars Inc.’s $23 billion purchase of the gum maker. Buffett, who already owns See’s Candies, is helping to fund the deal with $4.4 billion in subordinated debt.

“This is the kind of market where you would expect the pace of Berkshire acquisitions to pick up,” says Keith Trauner, senior analyst of Fairholme Capital Management LLC in Short Hills, New Jersey. “In a weaker business environment, sellers moderate their expectations.”

Berkshire owns 8.6 percent of Coca-Cola Co., 13.1 percent of American Express Co. and 8.8 percent of Wells Fargo & Co. Those three investments alone amounted nearly $25 billion on June 24.

Insurance firms dominate the list of Berkshire-owned companies. Buffett controls a dozen of them — Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance, General Re Corp. and Geico Corp. are the biggest — accounting for 31 percent of Berkshire’s 2007 revenue.

What makes Buffett want to buy? He himself says there’s no secret formula, because each company’s dynamic is unique. Berkshire is most active when markets go awry.

20-Year Perspective

“I’m not interested in what happens next quarter,” says Buffett told him. “I’m interested in the next 20 years.”

Now that you know Buffett is buyingk, my question to you is are you?

Advertise Here with Today.com

No responses yet

Jul 25 2008

RRSPs now protected against creditors in case of bankruptcy

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Effective July 7, RRSPs, RRIFs and Deferred Profit Sharing Plans can no longer be seized by creditors in case of bankruptcy.

This follows recent legislative amendments to the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). These changes are facilitating the coming into force of the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (WEPPA). As a result, all types of registered investments are now subject to protection against the claims of creditors due to bankruptcy proceedings.

So, you can be safe in your thinking that RRSPs cannot be touched in times of trouble by your creditors

No responses yet

Jul 21 2008

WSJ article on being rational

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Great, a nice article on things I’ve been harping on in Wall Street Journal

Here’s the video on the article

http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid452319854/bctid1676282639

And here’s the article and link

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121642720591866951.html

Here are the main oints from the article, to read the whole article hit the link above

How to Control Your Fears In a Fearsome Market
July 19, 2008; Page B1

Merely reading the words “market crash” in this sentence can instantaneously jack up your pulse and your blood pressure, the output of your sweat glands and the tension in your muscles.

The countless people who bailed out of the market in the horrifying plunge of October 2002 missed out on the generous returns of 2003 through 2007, when stocks returned 12.8% annually. The same is likely to be true of those who cut and run in today’s turbulent market.

Fortunately, you can train your brain to stay calm when the markets are gripped by panic.

Here are some ways you can control your fears.

Reappraise. Forget what you paid for that stock or fund; instead, imagine it was a gift. Now that it is priced, say, 20% more cheaply than in December, should you want to return the gift? Or should you buy more while it is on sale? (If rethinking a fallen price this way doesn’t make you feel better, maybe you should sell.)

Because fear is as contagious as the flu, quarantine yourself from anyone who obsesses over the momentary twitching of the Dow. Tear yourself away from the computer or television.

Intelligent investors act out of patience and courage, not panic.

ultimately it’s all about being rational in an irrational world

No responses yet

Jul 20 2008

Market Notes July 20 2008

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

What a week, the excitement was spread over three days, with Monday’s plunge followed by a tussle on Tuesday before the eventual lift-off on Wednesday.

The S&P/TSX index Index off 1.4% for week is down more than 10 per cent from the high of 15,073 from just one month ago. That’s a 10% drop in a month! How about that index investors! Did you realize that an index could fall 10% in a month!

The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended the week 3.6%, at 11,497; its 4.9% rise after Tuesday was its biggest three-day gain since March 2003.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 index rose 1.7%, to 1261 and is 19.5% off its October peak. Again, since October this index is down about 20%. How now, index investor champions. What about all those lower MERs did they end up helping you cushion your investments.

This is the fallacy around index investing, in thinking that the downside is also better. I don’t see too many media heads commenting on the volatility of thes index funds.

What led the Toronto markets were those beaten up Financials, as investors felt more confident about bank stocks following good news from Citigroup.

Citigroup gained $1.38 to $19.35 after a 2Q loss of $2.5 billion beat analyst forecasts. This followed stronger-than-expected results earlier in the week from JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo, easing worries about American banks.

Elsewhere in the financial sector, Merrill Lynch lost $4.89 billion during the second quarter, hit by almost $10 billion of write downs and charges. Merrill’s shares edged up 18 cents to $30.91.

Again, it shows the stupidity of following these analysts expectations. Personally, i think they and the people that listen to them are to blame for the markets pyrotechnics.

The financial sector, which has absorbed the brunt of the fallout from the credit crunch, jumped more than 10% in the past three sessions, buoyed by results from banks south of the border that were not as bad as expected.

Wells Fargo managed to raise dividends, JPMorgan Chase managed to top estimates, and the $2.5 billion Citigroup lost last quarter manages to be less than feared.

Another great reason for the boyancy in fiannciasl were the regulators finally realzing that the specualtors need to be warned and have their hands slapped. The market got a boost from the Securities and Exchange Commission, which ordered a ban on naked short-selling of shares of primary dealers including the biggest banks and investment banks — and mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - naked short selling is selling shares short before you’ve arranged to borrow them.

The ban, which takes effect Monday, altered the trading world for these stocks. From their Wednesday intraday lows, Fannie Mae shares doubled to $13.40; Freddie Mac shares more than doubled to $9.18. One reason for the gain: Freddie Mac won approval from regulators on Friday to sell the stock needed to overcome mounting losses, and the Wall Street Journal said the mortgage finance company may seek $10 billion.

The too-convenient rule change promises to make it costlier for traders to bet aggressively against some financial stocks. The 150 stocks within the S&P 1500 with the heftiest short interest jumped 15% over two days, while those with the least short betting struggled to scratch out a 2% gain.

Can financials survive the summer without falling back? It helps that investor expectations were almost nonexistent. Among companies that have reported earnings so far, only 49% of financial stocks have beaten estimates — the worst among S&P sectors, says Bespoke Investment Group. But those beating estimates saw shares jump 10.1% in the ensuing sigh of relief, and even those missing their marks shimmied up an average 3%. Contrast that with the crowded shelter of consumer staples, where 71% of companies have so far beaten estimates only to see their shares pull back 4.7%.

U.S. financial stocks beckon because nearly every major company now trades for under 10 times projected 2009 profits. Though there is considerable uncertainty about ‘09 profits, considering the tough economic outlook, what is comforting is that many financials combine low forward P/Es with and low ratios of price-to-book value, derived by subtracting liabilities from assets and dividing by the company’s outstanding shares. It historically has proven profitable to snap up major financials around book value because purchasers effectively are getting the ongoing businesses for nothing.

The last time financial stocks were hit so badly was in 1990, when the group fell 24%. That was followed by a 43% gain in 1991.

Buffett was a big buyer last year of Wells Fargo — at an average price above the current level.

But financial stocks are not out of the woods yet. Henry Paulson the US Treasury Secretary and Benny B did say that some 90 small banks could go bust

OIL

Just as important: Stocks’ rise was lubricated by oil’s slide, as crude fell $16.20 or 11.2% to $129 a barrel — its biggest weekly drop in dollar terms ever! Here, too, I suspect, Congress’ huffing and puffing about commodity-index speculation sent a bit of a shiver through futures traders.

The Friday decline followed tumbles of $5.31 on Thursday, $4.14 on Wednesday and a drop of $6.44 on Tuesday.

Just last week, crude traded above $147 a barrel.

The last time oil fell by 2% or more on three consecutive days from its year’s highs was in September 2000, which marked the start of a rocky patch and a year-long decline in Oil.

“If this is not the bubble’s implosion, then it’s a reasonable facsimile,” said analyst and trader Stephen Schork in daily market commentary.

“Perhaps all we have witnessed was a replay of last August’s subprime induced sell-off. Time will tell. Nevertheless, for the time being we no longer care to hold a bullish view,” Schork said.

GOLD

Global demand for gold fell 16 per cent year-on-year in the first quarter of this year. Demand in India dipped 50 per cent in the period. 50 percent!! and India’s one of Gold’s biggest purchasers, so if the demand has gone down, and the supplies about the same - Why is the price so bloody well high - Speculators!!

Google disappoints

Investor disappointment was directed at Google, whose earnings jumped 35 per cent to $1.25 billion (U.S.) or $4.63 per share, missing analyst expectations by 11 cents per share. Google stock fell $52.12 or 9.77 per cent to $481.32 amid worries that the ailing U.S. economy is hitting the Internet search leader.

Uhmmm, let me get this right increase in earning sof 35%, missed some stupid analysts bogus expectations by 11%, so the stock that just made $1.25 billion drops some 10%. Am, I the only one that’s confused,a nd wondering what these analysts are smoking?

Can the rally continue?

So, can stocks can continue to move higher — and will oil move lower?

Let’s start with “Can the market move higher?”

Stocks could be buoyed if crude’s big drop can continue and pull the already-weakening energy sector lower.

Since stocks have tended to move in an opposite direction to oil, further drops in crude could boost stocks.

There is increasing evidence that global demand for oil and various fuels is falling under the weight of sharply higher prices. Motorists around the world are being more careful in how much they drive, and airlines are cutting flights and mothballing increasing numbers of planes, hoping just to survive.

But there’s a big caveat: Iran. The United States will sit in on meetings with Iranian diplomats in Geneva this weekend, and the hope is to get the Iranians to reduce their nuclear program. If there’s progress, crude oil could drop further. If there isn’t, crude could move higher.

We will need to see which of the small loaded with real estate will go bust.

Also the poor consumer, is shopped out and being hammered by falling home prices, falling equity prices, falling jobs and incomes, rising inflation.

Stay rational because Speculation is darn easy and very seductive but rational investing is difficult. Difficult because it requires;

Patience, patience, patience and more patience
Discipline
No emotion
Going against the crowd

No responses yet

Jul 14 2008

Market Points July 13 2008

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

John Templeton died this week, he will be sorely missed. Wise heads are becoming less and less in this market. He sold his firm to Franklin in 1992 for $440 Million.

SEC in the US found serious short comings in the practises of Moodys and other rating agencies. (which was a mjor reason for all the sub-prime problems). They put the potential for profit above the quality of their work. No kidding!

GM is now trading at the lowest level in 50 years. The Hummer brand is up for sale, and the shareholders wil meet in August to review the plans.

The TSX composite index has given back nearly all the gains it made earlier this year.

The sub-indexes have tracked the big economic trends. Financial service companies have been big losers, as some banks have been caught in the credit crisis.

Genuity Capital Markets reported on Thursday the country’s biggest bank RBC, “could” face another writedown of $900 million to $1.5 billion in the third quarter on widening credit spreads and deteriorating subprime investments. Royal Bank has already booked about $1.64-billion in pretax writedowns since the fourth quarter of last year. The bank’s stock fell for a third day in a row on high volume shares. The operative word here was “could”, I’m betting that Genuity is behind the shorting of RBC stock, and thereby putting this “could” into the markets.

In reality, write-offs are not direct impacts to real numbers. They are just “notional: amounts to say that we don’t think we’re going to get this money, so we will write off the debt on our books. Meanwhile back at the ranch, they’ll go full blast and collect the debt. Yep, they don’t tell the lenders not to pay them. So, next time around, all this newly collected debt is now magically turned into profits!

Energy companies are up, reflecting higher oil prices.

Crude oil prices hit a new record Friday, surging over $147 US a barrel, boosted by “threats” of missiles from Iran, and a “possible” disruption to tight global supplies.

Did you see the display of rocketry in Iran the other day - another reason to wonder what the heck is going on here. They could not get them all started - had to retouch the pictures to actually look like a threat!

What a hoot!

There are no supply/demand/upside/downside/fears/ worries or other nonsense. The speculators are running the commodities market.

Most drivers have modified their driving behaviour, even if only slightly, and have cut back on their consumption of gasoline. It is hard to believe that demand in N. America is still exceeding supply. And about China and India, most of them still drive scooters, and the increase in Oil prices after reduction in subsidies has made those drivers reconsider their car-lust.

I looked at my Google home page today - 10 plug-in electric cars being brought to market that would never have been considered but for $150.00 crude oil.

Canadians are getting stronger. Twenty years ago it took two people to carry ten dollars’ worth of groceries. Today, a five- year-old can do it!

Apparently TV viewing is up according to Nielsen. I’m not surprised with the price of OIl , less people are going on holiday or out to the movies, food places etc.

UNEMPLOYMENT IN CANADA

Unemployment rate creeps up to 6.2% in Canada

Canada’s unemployment rate crept up 0.1 percentage points in June to 6.2 per cent as the economy lost about 5,000 jobs.

Tens of thousands of Canadians, most of them in Ontario, lost their full-time jobs or were forced into part-time work last month. Four provinces added some full-time jobs but the other six had losses, including 45,500 that disappeared in Ontario.

Statistics Canada said the only industry with a notable increase in employment last month was professional, scientific and technical services, with monthly gains totaling 37,000 jobs.

“Reality may finally be catching up with the Canadian job market,” said Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist with BMO Capital Markets.

“Overall, June’s employment report shows a labour market that is moving closer in line with the slowing economic growth picture,” said TD Bank economist James Marple. “Job growth is a lagging indicator and the contraction experienced in the first quarter of this year is now showing up in the job numbers.”

Dawn Desjardins, assistant chief economist at RBC economics research, said Canada’s economy is set to continue to grow at a sub-potential pace.

“Today’s weaker-than-expected jobs report and the trade balance numbers set the stage for the Bank of Canada to hold the policy rate steady at next week’s rate-setting meeting despite policymakers’ growing concerns about the near-term inflation outlook,” Desjardins said.

And CIBC economist Krishen Rangasamy said Canadians should expect more monthly declines, or very modest gains, for the rest of the year as Canada’s export economy continues to struggle from reduced demand in the U.S.

But economists stressed that given the downward trajectory of job creation recently, the days of 30,000-a-month employment gains are past for at least the rest the year.

After starting 2008 on a tear by pumping out 46,000 new jobs, employment growth has almost uniformly slipped each month, leading to June’s outright losses. Meanwhile, full-time employment has fallen in three of the last four months for a total of 70,000.

Most economists said the central bank is unlikely to cut rates at its policy meeting next week, although they also said Governor Mark Carney is unlikely to follow the advice of the C. D. Howe Institute panel of economists that rates should be raised.

BCE

New chief executive George Cope, BCE’s main unit, Bell Canada, is hoping to cast a different public image, with a a “100-day plan”. This means firing 2,000 of its 15,000 managers in 100 days

BCE intends to overcome its biggest weakness — underperformance in the growing wireless-phone sector by its Bell Mobility business –by improving customer service and product offerings and investing heavily in its network and technology. LOL ?

They are still keeping the same old Chief Financial officer and all the other guys that got BCE into the mess it was in! So, I don’t think it’s that great a plan.

So, I guess Teachers Pension Plan is going to have to add even more money to make BCE work out. Fortunately, I don’t deal with them anymore I’ve already made the shift.

Mr. Cope noted in an interview that while the team is smaller, one extra executive is dedicated to customer service – Whopee, did they say ONE extra. “It’s an important message to all of our team members,” he said. “The customer level is where we have to win this game.”. Don’t say it – show it!

BCE is set to take on $32-billion in new debt in a buyout from Teachers set to close on Dec. 11. So, It’ll be tough get the cash ready. So more layoffs to come.

But Mr. Cope declined to offer specifics about layoffs. But there will be plenty of movement, even among the roughly 50,000 employees remaining within the BCE fold.

MORTGAGES

Bank of Montreal changes mortgage offerings after Ottawa changes rules. Should avoid a US style collapse.

Bank of Montreal said that it will immediately change its mortgage offerings ahead of regulatory changes set to take affect in October.

The bank said it will immediately set the maximum amortization period for mortgages at 35 years and require a minimum down payment of five per cent.

Ottawa moved to tighten the rules for government-guaranteed mortgages this week trying to prevent a US style meltdown.

Starting Oct. 15, the Finance Department said it will no longer guarantee 40-year mortgages and will require a minimum down payment of five per cent of the value of a home.

Government-backed insurance is currently available on mortgages where the loan-to-value ratio is up to 100 per cent - in other words the buyer has borrowed all the money to buy a home and then gets insurance coverage on the whole amount.

What will this mean, it should further reduce demand and eventually prices in Canadian real estate. Yep, real estate can come down. Who would have thought of it, just a year ago!

Real estate is not only sinking in the USA but it is also happening in UK, Ireland, Germany, China, even Japan. This is the fallout of global central bankers gone wild with their printing presses. Canada is at the edge of the pond and a large boulder was thrown into the middle 2 years ago. Just wait, the fun is just getting started.

The question now isn’t whether or not the value of houses in Canada will continue to drop, but rather a question of how severe this drop will be and for how long. Seeing as the U.S. housing sector is currently in the process of being flushed down the toilet, I’m guessing it’ll be years/decades before we see another increase in our home values.

You know what they say, what goes up, comes down, it had to because the rubber band could only stretch so far, before it snaps back, with so many people losing there jobs, & all the good paying ones in the auto sector going to other countries, it was inevitable.

FREDDIE

Mortgage stocks cut losses in frantic NYSE trading

The losses in shares of two huge U.S. mortgage companies and guarantors, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, hurt US investments and key U.S. politician had to step in and calm financial nerves by saying the companies were sound.

On Friday speculation fueled by the New York Times led to further drops as they reported that the U.S. government might have to take over one or both of them. The paper cited unnamed sources. Personally I think it was The tooth Fairy and the Easter Bunny.

Together, these two entities back or hold nearly half of the total $12 trillion US in mortgages. Most of it really good mortgages and not the sub-prime crap. Later on the Times said no government action is imminent.

The US Senate banking committee chairman Christopher Dodd said the companies have access to the capital they need. He said he talked with Federal Reserve chairman Benji Bernanke and U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, and that the two are “looking at various options” for supporting the companies if they need it.

Moreover, some analysts said there was no fundamental reason for the price drops.

The volume was huge, with a combined total of 800 million shares changing hands. The two together usually trade about 40 million shares a day. The 800 million is equal to half the total volume of all stocks traded in New York on a typical day. Wow!

The two companies buy mortgages and repackage them as investments, a key role in the financial underpinnings of U.S. home ownership.

Without them, the US economy would collapse. So, the government will come to the rescue, and not allow them to go bankrupt.

Fannie Mae exists to ensure mortgage lenders have enough funds to lend to homebuyers at low rates.

Freddie Mac finances housing for low- and moderate-income families by ensuring there’s a stable supply of money for lenders to make the loans new homebuyers need.

No responses yet

Jul 13 2008

America’s got talent?

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Okay so, I missed America’s America’s got talent. Not that I really think I missed anything.

But I did catch the fine print on the $1 million prize.

Apparently, it’s held in an annuity and paid out over 40 years.

This works out to roughly $20,000 a year! So much for the $1 million prize

All this proves to me is that America doesn’t have Talent.

No responses yet

Jul 13 2008

Short term investing

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

I got asked a strange question the other day - Any suggestions as to what I should do to invest short term?

To me the concept of short term investing is oxymoronic. there’s no such thing. Bu definition, investing rides out the waves of the markets.

So, the definition I use for investing is that I am leaving the money for five years or longer.

Somewhere out there I read about a piece of research (I think it was Andex) that showed that 97% of the 5 year periods in the stock markets made money, and 66% of the 3 year periods made money.

So, the probability of you losing money short term in the markets goes up dramatically. It’s just a lousy place to play short term, even for the experts.

No, I don’t do day trading, and I don’t like holding single shares.

I do prefer diversified portfolios.

I just accept that 10 years from now, the best and the brightest companies will go up in value, and that’s how I think about it.

I do short term saving, and act my wage! Not live beyond it.

I do believe in Bonds and Dividends, because they don’t go up as much, but neither do they go down as much.

This is a pretty boring financial strategy. But, it’d done me well.

What I’ve learnt is that Wealthy people don’t do anything fancy, they just do common sense stuff, and they continue to do it. Whether the markets up or down!

I wouldn’t recommend trying to do something exciting! That’s what leads to heart attacks!

No responses yet

Jul 13 2008

Are you being sold FEAR

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Investors these days are being sold FEAR. Eight years ago they were being sold GREED.

In 1992, I read a book called “How to profit from the coming depression”, apparently the big depression has not come yet. But the author, a Howard Ruff, did make a lot of money selling his book to Chicken Littles

Let’s look at the weather, if I predicted Hurricanes every day in Toronto, and that’s all I ever did. I could be wrong for 15, 20 years. But, one day I get it right. Does that make me a genius? I don’t think so! If I’m wrong 99.5% of the time, am I a genius because of the 0.5% of the time I got it right. I don’t think so!

Some people are making a lot of money by selling FEAR. Especially the media and newspapers.

In all honesty, if I just said Buy a Balanced portfolio and you will do just fine. Nobody would pay attention to me, especially the media – it’s just not juicy enough. Nobody wants to hear that – they want to hear what’s exciting – depression, recession, correction, blood bath, CRASH!

People don’t want to read “Nothing much happened yesterday, and even if it did, it wouldn’t really affect you” – Right, But you know what, that’s probably the most accurate headline you would ever read. In reality, most of the stuff in the news does not impact us directly. Sure Oil prices affect us at the pumps, and they’ll adjust themselves eventually, sure the Canadian dollar affects our exports. But if I’m holding a balanced portfolio that rebalances back – it doesn’t really affect me over my investment horizon.

A lot of people grab on to a headline – but wise investors like Warren Buffet and David Dreman go opposite to the headline. When they see “Banks are in Dire Trouble” – they end up buying them – Warren Buffet with Wells Fargo and David Dreman with JP Morgan and others.

Sooner or later that market fundamentals will change, and the change will come at a surprising time. Just like the Earths climate moves in cycles, so do investments.

Now and then you get Rain and Thunder, but it doesn’t last. You get most of the Thunder and lightening after you’ve had a most heat and humidity – similar with the markets. A lot of the Thunder and Lightening now is because of the heat and humidity built into the financial system, and the thunder, lightening and rain are just cooling it down. If you want to know where the next Thunder and Lightening is going to be – look at where the heat and humidity has moved to now – Energy, Oil.

No responses yet

Jul 13 2008

Understand the sizzle and look for the steak

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

I always get concerned with products that are too popular to buy, or are being over promoted. This has almost always come back to bite the investor – think, technology funds, think Mackenzie Select Funds, think Portus! Right now, the hot and easy product to buy is the insurance based guaranteed withdrawal benefit products.

Oh, yes, you’ve seen the ads, guarantee income, guarantee principal, guarantee this and that, and all because it turns the investment world upside down. Well it does turn the investment world upside down. It turns it the wrong way up – what is not explained, is the Fees, and the likely hood of achieving returns, and the fact that the hguarantee is of income not return.

The thing is that they are an easy thing to sell when the markets aren’t doing well or are choppy – Now! They are sold based on the 5% guarantee of income, higher than a GIC and most government bonds. So, yep people who do not delve in deeper get caught by the subtle difference between guarantee of “income” and guarantee of “return”. They are not the same.

When you are putting money into these you are still exposing it to market risk. But, they call it guarantee of principal and guarantee of 5% income. The missing link is the investment period of 20 years or more. Over 20 years, any sound investment will get you your principle and provide a return greater than 5%. The word “guarantee” is not needed here.

When getting these make sure that you are reading the fine print, and understand how that 5% comes to be.

Let’s say you put that money in for 5 years and then you began to withdraw. Let’s say you put in $100,000 and after 5 years, 5% per year would mean that the portfolio should be $125,000. But, the market returns has not been that good, and say the market value is actually $90,000. At that stage the only guarantee you have is you have is if you stay with the investment for 20 years. You can’t take the $125,000 and leave, you can’t sell it and buy a cottage, and you can’t give it to your kids. You have to stay there if you want your guaranteed income, and it will always have to stay there until the market value reaches above the $125,000 value. You could stay there for the rest of your life!

People think that if they leave their money in for 15 years it will make 5% plus the market return. Noooo. This is a “notional” (not real return – see http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/notional).

You can’t take that money, and it is NOT PLUS MARKET RETURN. No, Sireee

Also for 15 years, you can buy almost anything and your principal is guaranteed!

So be aware, and don’t do the wrong thing.

Is there a case for them, sure. But for those that already have other alternatives.

No responses yet

Jul 13 2008

Gold and Warren

Published by rational under Uncategorized Edit This

Warren Buffet says - Gold gets dug out of the ground in Africa or some place like that, then we buy it melt it down and dig another hole. We then pay someone to stand around guarding it. It has no utility, Anyone watching from Mars woudl be scratching their heads.

Gold produces no dividends, no earnings, it’s simply a metal whose value is based on what somebody else is willing to pay for it - I don’t think it fundamentally has any use. IF you want to hedge against inflation, there are other assets, like corn or Food.

Still gold goes up, becasue of mass psychology. A lot fo the value of gold is based on speculative interest, in it, and against teh US dollar.

No responses yet

Next »

Advertise Here